google.com, pub-5167539840471953, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0

Is Free Speech a Relic of the Past? Exploring the Technocensorship Dilemma

In this age of advanced technology and collaborative suppression, we’ve managed to upgrade our book-burning techniques to the digital realm. Who needs matches when you can just press a button, right? So, let’s all raise a toast to our brave new world, where free speech is so yesterday, and where algorithms reign supreme in telling us what to think and how to behave. Don’t worry, though – Big Brother is just a friendly algorithm away, ensuring that you’ll never have to worry about pesky things like individuality and independent thought. Cheers to a future where our minds are safe and sound within the cozy confines of the Ministry of Technocensorship!

Government-Corporate Collaboration and the Threat to Free Expression

The world has witnessed various methods of suppressing ideas throughout history, and today we find ourselves in a reality reminiscent of Ray Bradbury’s cautionary words: “There is more than one way to burn a book. And the world is full of people running about with lit matches.” This modern-day equivalent of book burning is characterized by the elimination of dissenting ideas and the individuals who express them. Seventy years after Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 depicted a society where books are burned to stifle opposing thoughts, and mass media is used to control the masses, we are confronted with an unsettlingly similar situation.

Welcome to the Era of Technocensorship

In theory, we maintain the freedom to express ourselves, protected under the First Amendment. Yet, in practice, our speech is now constrained by the whims of government officials and corporate giants like Facebook, Google, and YouTube.

Internal documents uncovered by the House Judiciary Select Subcommittee on Weaponization of the Federal Government have confirmed suspicions that government entities collaborate with social media companies to silence speech. This form of censorship involves deliberate efforts to muzzle and eradicate any ideas that challenge the government’s approved narrative.

The Chilling Effects of Political Correctness

This kind of censorship represents an extreme manifestation of political correctness, a technofascism that sees powerful corporate and governmental entities working together to achieve a shared objective. While these tech giants have managed to evade First Amendment restrictions due to their private status, their collusion with the government is concerning.

Philip Hamburger and Jenin Younes point out that the First Amendment prohibits government-led suppression of free speech. The notion that the government can employ private companies to carry out its censorship is constitutionally questionable.

The Dystopian Reality

What we witness is a creeping form of censorship imposed by corporate tech giants, authorized by those in power. This trend, if allowed to continue, could lead to a reality resembling George Orwell’s 1984, where a Ministry of Truth controls information to manipulate public perception.

Orwell intended his novel as a warning, yet it is now being used as a blueprint for molding a compliant and obedient society. As artificial intelligence becomes an integral part of government functions, we risk being subject to the unyielding judgments of technological rulers.

The Slippery Slope of Censorship

Censorship has escalated gradually, moving from targeting so-called “extremists” to suppressing discussions on sensitive topics like elections, pandemics, and vaccines. The normalization of such censorship is concerning, as it threatens to silence dissenting voices and shape public discourse according to the whims of those in power.

Defending Free Speech: A Shared Responsibility

The silencing of individuals or groups, regardless of their beliefs, should alarm us all. Ignoring the long-term consequences of censorship is a dangerous oversight. Allowing the government and corporate entities to wield unchecked power over speech paves the way for future tyranny.

The Warning Signs of Ongoing Oppression

Glenn Greenwald highlights a crucial fallacy in pro-censorship arguments: the belief that censorship will only target disliked views. In reality, tech giants prioritize protecting the powerful and preserving their interests. Censorship can quickly evolve from stifling unpopular ideas to silencing the truth itself.

As George Orwell foresaw, telling the truth may become an act of rebellion. When the government controls speech, it controls thought and ultimately, the minds of its citizens. This trend towards totalitarianism is already underway, as we witness routine encroachments on our freedoms under the guise of national security and government speech.

The Gradual Decline of Freedom

Much like Easter Island’s collapse due to resource depletion, America faces a similar erosion of freedom through incremental changes. This gradual loss, termed “creeping normality,” sees citizens adapting to the erosion of rights without resistance.

The path to preserving freedom requires vigilance and collective action. We must recognize the signs of oppression and defend our right to express diverse viewpoints. Just as Easter Island’s inhabitants failed to halt their decline, we risk surrendering our liberties unless we actively safeguard them.

In conclusion, the age of tech censorship poses a substantial threat to free expression. Collaboration between government and corporate entities has led to a chilling environment where dissenting ideas are silenced. It is our shared responsibility to defend free speech, recognizing the slippery slope that leads to the erosion of our fundamental rights. As we navigate this challenging terrain, we must remain vigilant and resolute in protecting the legacy of freedom for future generations.

Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Real News Cast needs reader support to survive. 

Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)

Please Contribute via  GoGetFunding