, pub-5167539840471953, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0

Tribunal Upholds Daycare’s Decision to Remove Unvaccinated Children

In a recent ruling by the B.C. Civil Resolution Tribunal, a daycare in the province of British Columbia has been supported in its decision to expel two children due to their lack of COVID vaccinations. The case sheds light on the complexities of vaccine mandates, individual rights, and the evolving landscape of COVID-related policies.

Unvaccinated Children Removed from Daycare: A Legal Perspective

Background: The province of British Columbia, governed by the New Democratic Party (NDP), implemented stringent COVID mandates from mid-2020 to late 2022. This period witnessed widespread closures, job implications, and social division due to vaccination mandates.

Tribunal Ruling: The B.C. Civil Resolution Tribunal recently ruled in favor of a daycare facility, dismissing a claim filed by a mother, identified as JM, whose children were removed from the daycare due to their unvaccinated status. JM had sought compensation for mental distress, contending that her childcare contract was unfairly terminated.

Vaccine Policy Conflict: JM’s children, who had not received COVID vaccinations, were at the center of a dispute with the daycare operator, known as KM. JM argued that the daycare’s demand for vaccination was a unilateral change to the contract’s terms. However, the tribunal recognized that KM had the right to modify COVID-19 policies and terminate the contract under reasonable notice.

Legal Standpoint: The tribunal’s ruling affirmed that KM had fulfilled her obligations under the contract and had provided sufficient notice. Consequently, the daycare was deemed entitled to unilaterally terminate the contract, thereby dismissing JM’s claim.

Impact on Canadian Society: The debate surrounding COVID vaccine mandates has led to polarization within Canadian society. The mRNA vaccines, although approved for use, have raised concerns about negative side effects, particularly in children. The controversy has even led some religious groups, such as Catholics, to resist vaccination due to connections with aborted cell lines.

Discrimination and Legal Challenges: Many Canadians who chose not to receive the COVID shots faced discrimination. A recent case involves Ross Wightman, who sued various entities after experiencing severe adverse effects from the AstraZeneca vaccine. Health authorities in British Columbia continue to advocate for COVID shots, despite growing evidence of potential harm.

Conclusion: The B.C. Civil Resolution Tribunal’s decision to support the daycare’s removal of unvaccinated children underscores the complexities of COVID vaccine mandates and their implications on individual rights. As the vaccination landscape evolves, legal challenges and societal debates continue to shape the ongoing dialogue surrounding public health measures.

Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Real News Cast needs reader support to survive. 

Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)

Please Contribute via  GoGetFunding