The notion that jet fuel could melt steel beams is often a focal point in 9/11 conspiracy theories. However, this perspective misrepresents the complex physics involved in the events of September 11, 2001. To understand the dynamics at play, we need to delve into the science of structural engineering and the behavior of steel under extreme conditions.

Steel, a common construction material, has a melting point of approximately 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit (1,371 degrees Celsius). Jet fuel, primarily composed of kerosene, burns at around 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit (982 degrees Celsius under optimal conditions. These numbers immediately raise questions about the conspiracy theory’s premise, which suggests that jet fuel alone was responsible for melting the steel beams in the World Trade Center.

Jet fuel didn’t melt steel beams.

Jet fuel softened steel beams enough to cause them to fail under load.

The exact same thing happened recently in Philadelphia when a tanker truck full of gasoline crashed under the I-95 Bridge and caught fire.

The heat softened the steel beams and the bridge collapsed.

But no one is calling this an “inside job” or claiming it’s physically impossible for mere gasoline to do this.

While it’s true that jet fuel did play a role in the fires that followed the plane impacts, it didn’t reach temperatures high enough to directly melt the steel beams. However, it did weaken the structural integrity of the steel by causing it to lose its load-bearing capacity. This weakening effect occurred due to several factors:

1. Heat Transfer: The fires ignited by the jet fuel released intense heat. Steel is an excellent conductor of heat, which means that it quickly absorbed this heat and began to expand. As it expanded, it weakened, losing its structural integrity.
2. Insulation: The structural steel in the World Trade Center was coated with fire-resistant materials. While these materials provided some insulation, the intensity and duration of the fires overwhelmed their protective capabilities. As a result, the steel began to heat up rapidly.
3. Thermal Expansion: As steel heats up, it expands. In the context of a skyscraper, this expansion can cause significant stress and deformations. The weakening of steel’s load-bearing capacity can lead to structural failure.
4. Combustible Materials: In addition to the jet fuel, there were numerous combustible materials within the buildings, including office furnishings, paper, and other flammable items. These contributed to the persistence and intensity of the fires.
5. Gravity and Load Redistribution: The damage caused by the plane impacts compromised the integrity of the buildings. As structural elements failed, the load distribution in the buildings changed, placing additional stress on the remaining support structures.

Ultimately, it was not the melting of steel beams that caused the collapse of the World Trade Center towers but the combination of factors described above. The fires and the subsequent structural damage led to a cascading failure of the buildings’ support systems. The upper floors collapsed onto the lower ones, causing a chain reaction that brought down the entire structure.

In conclusion, the notion that jet fuel alone could melt steel beams oversimplifies the complex sequence of events that led to the collapse of the World Trade Center towers on 9/11. Multiple factors, including heat transfer, insulation, thermal expansion, combustible materials, and structural damage, contributed to the tragedy. The official investigations conducted by experts in the field of structural engineering and fire science support these conclusions, dispelling the misconceptions associated with conspiracy theories.

Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Real News Cast needs reader support to survive. 

Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)

Please Contribute via  GoGetFunding