In a bold move, the European Union has set forth a proposal to eliminate all “gendered language” from everyday speech, challenging words deemed as perpetuating stereotypes. The initiative, spearheaded by The European Institute for Gender Equality, advocates for a linguistic shift towards politically correct communication, providing an extensive list of unacceptable terms and their suggested alternatives.
The Toolkit on Gender-sensitive Communication: Unveiling Language Reforms
The 61-page document, known as the Toolkit on Gender-sensitive Communication, categorizes words and phrases that are to be replaced with more gender-neutral alternatives. Terms such as ‘Master of ceremonies,’ ‘No man’s land,’ ‘Manpower,’ and ‘Repairman’ are among those marked for transformation into ‘host,’ ‘Unclaimed territory,’ ‘human power,’ and ‘Repairer.’.
One of the notable proposals is the substitution of ‘Joe public’ with ‘average citizen,’ reflecting a desire for language that transcends gender norms.
Controversy Surrounding Linguistic Changes.
Conservative MP Nigel Mills has expressed strong opposition, deeming the initiative as “utter madness” and an “attack on the English language.” The EU’s suggestion to switch the order of ‘King and Queen’ also faces criticism, with concerns about altering traditional hierarchical concepts.
HOwever, the most contentious aspect emerges in the attempt to erase words unrelated to gender. Terms like ‘bossy,’ ‘pushy,’ and ‘shrill’ are flagged for removal due to their aleged association with women. Proposed replacements include ‘assertive’ and descriptors like ‘high-pitched’ or ‘grating voice.’.
Navigating Linguistic Transformation: A Strong Stand on Neutral Language.
The EU Institute contends that eradicating words like ‘virility,’ strongly linked to men, is necessary, advocating for alternatives like ‘strong or energetic.’ The persistence of the term ‘strong’ in suggested replacements underscores a commitment to neutralizing language from gender connotations.
The broader context reflects a trend in linguistic policing aimed at fostering sensitivity and inclusivity. Efforts to redefine language, even beyond gender-specific terms, raise questions about the boundaries between linguistic evolution and preserving traditional expressions.
In conclusion, the EU’s call for a linguistic transformation, while aiming for more inclusive language, sparks debates about the limits of language policing. As discussions unfold, the impact of these proposed changes on cultural norms and communication dynamics remains a topic of intense scrutiny.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Real News Cast needs reader support to survive.
Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)
Please Contribute via GoGetFunding
