, pub-5167539840471953, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0

Does Believing a Lie Make it True?

The author of this article laments the state of our society, which they compare to the dystopian worlds depicted in George Orwell’s 1984 and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World.

They argue that the ruling class manipulates, subjugates, and propagandizes the masses through lies, deceptions, and fear, using techniques like behavioral conditioning, restriction of freedom of speech, and propaganda to create false narratives. The author also speculates about how certain politicians and government officials would fare on a lie detector test, given the large volume of lies they have told.

Finally, the author suggests that the majority of people in society prefer comforting lies to unpleasant truths, and are more interested in trivialities like sports and reality TV than in seeking out the truth.

The author of this text references George Orwell’s analysis of mass media deception and how the ruling class manipulates the truth to suit their needs.

The author argues that the proliferation of modern forms of media, like the internet and social media, has made it easier for the ruling class to deceive the public and maintain control through lies and deception.

They suggest that concepts like right and wrong, good and evil, and truth and falsity are meaningless to those in power, who are solely interested in maintaining their wealth and control over the masses. The author also asserts that the masses are heavily indoctrinated and confused by propaganda, making it difficult for them to resist the control of the ruling class.

The author of this text asserts that the response to the COVID-19 pandemic is an example of mass media deception, specifically citing the shift in messaging about the effectiveness of masks in preventing the spread of the virus.

They claim that initially, medical experts like Dr. Fauci dismissed the idea that masks could be helpful, but later reversed their position and insisted that masks were necessary to prevent mass death. The author also suggests that any dissenting voices that questioned the usefulness of masks were silenced by social media platforms and mainstream media outlets, who were acting at the behest of the ruling elite and being paid off by pharmaceutical companies.

The author of this text claims that the COVID-19 pandemic was part of a worldwide conspiracy of lies, with the origin of the virus being a cover-up for illegal weaponization in a laboratory in Wuhan.

They also allege that social media platforms and mainstream media outlets censored and banned those who questioned the official narrative. In addition, the author asserts that the demand for national lockdowns was based on false assumptions from a flawed model presented by Neil Ferguson and that the decision to lockdown had disastrous consequences for millions of people around the world, in contrast to Sweden’s decision not to lockdown.

The author of this text makes a number of claims about the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including that officials lied about social distancing and used a PCR test improperly to produce false positive cases in order to terrify the public. They also suggest that the fatality rate of COVID-19 was drastically overestimated and that only a small percentage of COVID-19 deaths can be attributed solely to the virus.

The author further claims that the overall survival rate for COVID-19 is high, especially for those under 70 years old, and that virtually no one under 21 years old died from COVID-19. They argue that the ruling class and their allies in government, media, and academia sought to generate fear about the pandemic in order to enrich themselves and further their Great Reset plan to create a compliant surveillance state. Finally, the author asserts that virologists ignored the concept of herd immunity in their pursuit of a COVID-19 vaccine.

The author of this text claims that the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, like other government efforts such as the War on Poverty and the War on Drugs, has been a failure in terms of addressing the virus, but has been successful in enriching politicians, and corporations, and those in media, academia, and the bureaucracy who disseminate lies and disinformation.

They argue that the vaccine for COVID-19 is based on lies and deception, citing issues with Pfizer’s trial data and the fact that mRNA gene therapies had previously failed in testing. The author also claims that there were existing medications that were effective in treating COVID-19, such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, but that the push for emergency use authorization for the COVID-19 vaccine was motivated by the desire for profit by pharmaceutical companies and the distribution of that profit to politicians and other members of the ruling class.

According to the author of this text, Dr. Fauci and his supporters claimed that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were dangerous and ineffective, leading social media platforms to censor and ban doctors who posted positive information about these treatments. The author also accuses Dr. Fauci of recommending treatments, like Remdesivir, that he financially benefited from and of denying other treatments that could have saved lives. They further claim that Dr. Fauci is treated like a saint by the media and those aligned with the Biden administration, despite deserving punishment for his actions.


Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Real News Cast needs reader support to survive. 

Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)

Please Contribute via  GoGetFunding