google.com, pub-5167539840471953, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0

Who Leaked the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization Opinion?

In this article, we will discuss the recent statement made by Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, who believes that he knows who leaked a draft opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

The Controversy Surrounding the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization Case

The Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization case has been making headlines recently, as it could potentially overturn Roe v. Wade, a landmark case that established a woman’s right to abortion. The case centers around Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban, which was challenged by the Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the only abortion clinic in the state.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s Statement

In a surprising statement to The Wall Street Journal, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito claimed that he has a “pretty good idea” who leaked a draft opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. He strongly suggested that it was someone who opposed the opinion and wanted to pressure the justices not to go forward with the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

Alito went on to say that he personally knows who is responsible for the leak, but he does not have the level of proof needed to name the person. This statement contradicts the court’s earlier statement that the team led by Marshal of the Supreme Court Gail Curley “has to date been unable to identify a person responsible by a preponderance of the evidence.”

The Implications of Alito’s Statement

Alito’s statement has caused quite a stir, as it suggests that the information on the specific suspect was shared with the justices. If this was a clerk and the evidence is known to all of the justices, it would be interesting if the justice responsible for the appointment felt comfortable in recommending the young lawyer for later employment.

Whoever is responsible for this leak violated the most fundamental rules of ethics in our profession. It was a betrayal of not just the Court and the bar, but the public in shattering the confidentiality of the judicial process.

In conclusion, Justice Samuel Alito’s recent statement regarding the leak of a draft opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization has caused quite a controversy. While he claims to know who is responsible for the leak, he does not have the level of proof needed to name the person. This leak was a betrayal of not just the Court and the bar, but the public in shattering the confidentiality of the judicial process. We will continue to follow this story and keep you updated on any new developments.

Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Real News Cast needs reader support to survive and thrive. 

Please do not give your hard-earned money to sites or channels that copy/paste our intellectual property. We spend countless hours vetting, researching, and writing. Thank you. Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)

Contribute to Real News Cast via  GoGetFunding

 

 

 

Scroll to Top