, pub-5167539840471953, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0

The Legal Implications and Financial Consequences Surrounding Donald Trump’s Online Posts

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is facing significant financial penalties each time he shares his thoughts online, even on his campaign website. This action, as suggested by The View co-host Whoopi Goldberg, calls for judges to take a stand by restricting Trump’s ability to exercise his First Amendment right to free speech. In this article, we will delve into the implications of these fines and their potential impact on Trump’s public statements, as well as examine the background of this issue.

The Call for Restriction

According to Whoopi Goldberg, a prominent TV personality and co-host of The View, the time has come for a more assertive approach to Trump’s online communication. She suggests that judges should implement substantial fines every time they disregard existing legal orders and restrictions. She emphasizes the need for the judge to declare, “You know what, D? I think from now on, every time you disparage or run over some other law that we’ve gag-ordered, it’s going to cost you $10 million.” This proposal was met with applause from a liberal audience.

The Legal Rulings

Judge Arthur Engoron made significant legal rulings on September 26 that have escalated this issue. Trump and his company were found liable for fraud in a case brought forward by Democratic Attorney General Letitia James of New York. In response to Trump’s violation of a gag order by not removing a post from his campaign website concerning a law clerk, Judge Engoron imposed a $5,000 fine. Subsequently, he levied a $10,000 fine after Trump referred to him as “very partisan” while speaking to reporters.

Goldberg’s Perspective

Whoopi Goldberg firmly believes that these financial penalties should be substantially increased to deter Trump from making public statements that contravene legal restrictions. She argues that Trump appears undeterred by the current fines of $5,000 and $10,000, as they seem inconsequential to him. She contends that the prospect of having to pay $10 million would be a powerful incentive for Trump to exercise caution and restraint in his public statements.

Engoron’s Ruling

Judge Arthur Engoron’s September ruling had a profound impact on the legal battle surrounding Trump. He ordered the rescission of several business licenses held by Trump and accepted allegations that Trump had overstated the value of various real estate properties, including Mar-a-Lago, the Florida estate he owns.

Real-Estate Valuation

Engoron’s valuation of Mar-a-Lago has been a subject of controversy, as real-estate experts have expressed dissent. Many experts argue that the $250,000,000 valuation assigned by the judge significantly undervalues the property. This ruling, along with previous judgments, demonstrates the severity of the legal issues Trump is facing.


The call for massive fines each time Donald Trump posts online, even on his campaign website, has gained momentum. Whoopi Goldberg and others believe that this approach is necessary to prevent Trump from making public statements that violate legal restrictions. Judge Arthur Engoron’s legal rulings have further intensified the situation, with significant financial penalties already imposed. The ongoing legal battle and valuation disputes surrounding Trump’s real estate properties continue to capture public attention and raise questions about the consequences of his actions. The evolution of this issue remains a focal point in the political and legal landscape.

Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Real News Cast needs reader support to survive. 

Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)

Please Contribute via  GoGetFunding




One thought on “The Legal Implications and Financial Consequences Surrounding Donald Trump’s Online Posts

Comments are closed.