, pub-5167539840471953, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0

Proposed Legal Changes: Deliberate Misgendering as a Hate Crime

In recent developments, the Labour Party has unveiled its intent to potentially categorize the deliberate use of ‘incorrect’ gender pronouns as a hate crime, with corresponding penalties of up to two years in prison. This bold move seeks to strengthen sentencing guidelines for acts of abuse and violence directed at transgender individuals. This article delves into the proposed changes and explores the implications of such a policy shift.

Proposed Changes by the Labour Party

Under the leadership of Keir Starmer, the Labour Party has proposed a significant legal amendment. Specifically, they aim to designate acts driven by hatred based on an individual’s gender identity as ‘aggravated offenses.’ This change, if enacted, would bring transphobic abuse in line with offenses related to race or religion, which currently carry a potential prison sentence of up to two years.

Implications of the Proposed Policy

The potential policy reform has sparked considerable debate and concern among various groups. Critics of the policy argue that it could lead to individuals facing jail sentences for refusing to use a transgender person’s preferred pronouns or for referencing their former name or birth sex, rather than their chosen gender identity. Such concerns have raised questions about freedom of expression and potential overzealous enforcement.

A Perspective from the Conservative Party

A senior Tory source expressed reservations about the proposed changes, pointing out that some police forces have been vigorous in pursuing alleged hate crimes. This individual suggested that the proposed policy could encourage even more rigorous enforcement, potentially leading to further arrests for acts such as misgendering.

Caroline Ffiske from Conservatives for Women has voiced concerns over the prioritization of ‘gender identity’ over biological sex. Many individuals, including thousands of women, dispute the notion that they should be obligated to refer to a person as ‘she/her’ when they may identify differently. Ffiske questions whether, under this policy, a woman could be accused of harassment for correctly identifying an individual’s biological sex, with such an act considered an aggravated offense.

A Case Highlighting the Complexities

To illustrate the complexities surrounding this issue, it’s worth mentioning a specific case from the past. In a previous incident, a Christian preacher, David McConnell, was convicted of harassing a transgender woman by using terms such as ‘man’ and ‘gentleman.’ This conviction resulted in McConnell receiving a 12-month community order. However, his conviction was subsequently overturned when magistrates ruled that there was no evidence of his intent to harass the individual.


The Labour Party’s proposed policy changes regarding the deliberate misuse of gender pronouns highlight a growing debate about the balance between freedom of expression and protection against discrimination and harassment. As these changes continue to be discussed and evaluated, it is crucial to consider the potential consequences and ensure that any legal amendments effectively address the concerns of all affected parties. Balancing the rights and sensitivities of transgender individuals with those who may have differing views is a challenging task that will likely require careful consideration and deliberation.

Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Real News Cast needs reader support to survive. 

Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)

Please Contribute via  GoGetFunding