, pub-5167539840471953, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0

Is Mark Zuckerberg’s Vaccine Tightrope Walk the Real Deal?

Well, folks, it seems Zuckerberg might need to brush up on his tightrope-walking skills. He’s walking a fine line between private concerns and public censorship, and it’s more tangled than a plate of spaghetti at an Italian restaurant. Let’s hope he’s not planning on joining the circus anytime soon!

In a startling revelation, new evidence has emerged, shedding light on a significant disparity between Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s private statements regarding mRNA vaccinations and the company’s public stance, which involved censoring users who sought to discuss the potential risks associated with these vaccines. This article delves into the early days of the pandemic when Zuckerberg cautioned Facebook executives about the unknown long-term side effects of mRNA injections, raising concerns about the modification of individuals’ DNA and RNA.

Private Warnings vs. Public Censorship: Zuckerberg’s Private Concerns

In the nascent stages of the pandemic, before Operation Warp Speed was initiated, and mRNA vaccines were still in their infancy, Mark Zuckerberg held a private meeting with Facebook executives. In this meeting, he expressed deep reservations about the mRNA injections, emphasizing the need for caution due to the uncertainty surrounding their long-term effects. He articulated concerns about the potential alteration of people’s DNA and RNA, underscoring the need for prudence.

Public Censorship Contradiction

While Zuckerberg privately acknowledged the uncertainties surrounding mRNA vaccines, Facebook, under his leadership, took a contradictory stance in the public domain. The platform actively censored and blocked medical professionals, scientists, and individuals who shared concerns similar to Zuckerberg’s private sentiments. This incongruity between private apprehensions and public actions raises questions about the transparency of the platform’s content moderation.

Zuckerberg’s Role in Disseminating Misinformation: Supporting Fauci’s Misinformation

Zuckerberg not only displayed hypocrisy but also actively contributed to the dissemination of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s controversial information regarding mRNA vaccines on his social media platform. In a March 15, 2020 email to Fauci, Zuckerberg expressed his support and offered assistance in disseminating Fauci’s message. He outlined plans for a Coronavirus Information Hub to be prominently featured on Facebook, which ultimately played a significant role in controlling the narrative surrounding the pandemic.

Censorship of Vaccine Injury Support Groups: Suppression of Vaccine Injury Discussions

As mounting evidence suggested serious injuries and fatalities linked to Operation Warp Speed vaccines, Zuckerberg’s Facebook took a drastic step by banning numerous vaccine injury support groups. These groups, comprising hundreds of thousands of members, were censored under the pretext of spreading “misinformation” related to vaccine injuries. This move hindered open dialogue on the subject and limited the dissemination of crucial information.

George Hu’s Ouster

One specific case of censorship involved George Hu, a software engineer responsible for Washington’s Covid Vaccine website. After developing tinnitus following vaccination, Hu shared his experience, asserting its authenticity. Nevertheless, Zuckerberg’s platform banned Hu’s vaccine injury support group, further suppressing the voices of vaccine injury victims.

Influence on Election Information: The Hunter Biden Laptop Controversy

Zuckerberg openly admitted to censoring the Hunter Biden laptop story in the lead-up to the 2020 election, citing a request from the FBI as the basis for this action. This revelation raised concerns about the potential impact on the election, given the narrow margin of victory in key swing states.

Funding Election Interference

In another controversial move, Zuckerberg funneled $440 million into a purported non-profit organization, CTCL, which subsequently directed the funds to government election officials. This financial maneuver raised allegations of election and voter fraud, further entangling Facebook’s role in political affairs.

Conclusion: The contrasting narratives of Mark Zuckerberg’s private concerns and Facebook’s public censorship practices highlight the complexity of the mRNA vaccine controversy. These revelations underscore the importance of transparency and open discourse on critical issues, especially during times of global crisis. As we grapple with the implications of these actions, it becomes evident that the intersection of technology, information, and public discourse remains a subject of intense scrutiny and debate.

Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Real News Cast needs reader support to survive and thrive. 

Please do not give your hard-earned money to sites or channels that copy/paste our intellectual property. We spend countless hours vetting, researching, and writing. Thank you. Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)

Contribute to Real News Cast via  GoGetFunding