Well, well, well, it seems like Dr. Fauci’s grand dreams of receiving a Nobel Prize might be coming true, but not quite in the way he anticipated. It’s all about “Crimes Against Humanity” and gain-of-function mishaps now! Who knew that the world of science could be this thrilling and full of unexpected twists?
In a shocking turn of events, Senator Rand Paul has taken a bold step by criminally referring Dr. Anthony Fauci to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for alleged “crimes against humanity” and his involvement in gain-of-function research. This move comes after Sen. Paul accused Dr. Fauci of lying to Congress during sworn testimony about overseeing the controversial research. In this article, we will delve into the details of the email that sparked this contentious situation and explore the implications it may have for Dr. Fauci and the DOJ.
The Email That Exposes Dr. Fauci’s Alleged Lies: The crux of Senator Paul’s accusations lies in an email from February 2020, where Dr. Fauci communicated with British medical researcher Jeremy Farrar, who was then the director of the Wellcome Trust. In this email, Dr. Fauci revealed details of a task force call involving other prominent scientists with expertise in evolutionary biology. They expressed concern about unusual mutations in the virus (nCoV) found in bats, raising suspicions that the mutations might have been intentionally inserted. This, in turn, pointed to the controversial gain-of-function experiments.
Senator Paul’s Strong Allegations: Sen. Paul highlighted the significant contradiction between Dr. Fauci’s email and his statements during the committee hearing. The Kentucky senator accused Fauci of denying any involvement in funding gain-of-function research, terming it an “absolute lie.” Consequently, he formally referred the matter to the DOJ as a criminal case.
Past Attempts to Hold Dr. Fauci Accountable: This isn’t the first time Senator Paul has attempted to alert the DOJ about Fauci’s alleged misdeeds. In July 2021, he wrote a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland, alleging that Fauci lied when he claimed that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) did not fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. However, it appears that his previous referral did not gain the desired traction.
Will Justice Be Served? Senator Paul’s latest referral may face challenges, given the current focus of the Department of Justice on other matters. Some argue that the DOJ is more concerned with protecting the interests of the Biden administration and pursuing cases against former President Trump. This raises doubts about the agency’s willingness to investigate alleged lies, cover-ups, and power plays surrounding the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Importance of Transparency: Despite the uncertain outcome, Senator Paul’s efforts are not in vain. By bringing these issues to light and creating an official record, he allows the American people to see what transpired during the pandemic’s early days. Furthermore, with future elections in mind, this information may serve as a crucial reference point for potential changes in leadership, ensuring that accountability prevails.
Conclusion: Senator Rand Paul’s bold move to refer Dr. Anthony Fauci to the DOJ for “crimes against humanity” and alleged involvement in gain-of-function research has stirred significant controversy. The email provided by Dr. Fauci himself appears to contradict his previous statements, giving weight to Sen. Paul’s accusations. While the outcome remains uncertain, it is vital that such matters are thoroughly examined to maintain transparency and accountability for the well-being of the nation. Senator Paul’s actions may not yield immediate results, but they play a pivotal role in upholding the principles of justice and responsibility.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Real News Cast needs reader support to survive.
Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)
Please Contribute via GoGetFunding
