In the midst of the ongoing global fight against the COVID-19 epidemic, governments and organizations throughout the world have been frantically searching for efficient methods to stem the virus’s further spread.
The health certificate system is one of the solutions that has been put into place. This system enables the authorities to keep track of persons’ health conditions as well as their movements. Although the purpose of this system is to prevent the further spread of the virus and safeguard the health of the general population, it also poses serious threats to individuals’ right to privacy and to civil rights.
Methods for Issuing Health Certificates in Different Countries
There are a few different systems for health certificates that have been implemented in different regions of North America and Europe, but none of them have been as widespread or as severely enforced as the QR-code system that is used in China. The zero-COVID policy that China has adopted has been helped tremendously by this system, which has been operational for the past three years. The color of a QR code shown on an individual’s phone served as the determining factor in that person’s freedom to move around, and access eateries and healthcare services.
In order to assess an individual’s likelihood of becoming infected with the virus, the QR-code system employs a mathematical formula. If it is determined that an individual poses a threat, their code will be changed to yellow, and they will be required to enter a quarantine facility at their own expense. In addition, the system is connected to the individual bank accounts of people so that they may make payments for required quarantine stays in hotels. On the other hand, this system has been attacked for its lack of transparency and for the infringement of human rights that it commits.
The Dangers Involved with Health Certification Systems
Because of their intrusive character, health certificate systems provide serious challenges to individuals’ rights to personal privacy and autonomy. It has been reported that individuals in China who spoke out against the stringent pandemic measures were given codes that were changed to yellow or red, which is an indication that the system may be used to repress dissent. It’s also possible that this technology may be used to invade people’s privacy by allowing authorities to track their whereabouts and check up on their health.
A further cause for worry is the possibility that the health certificate system would one day be used as a mechanism for the establishment of a supranational governing body. While it’s possible that the system was designed with good intentions in mind, it’s also possible that it may be utilized to further a globalist goal behind the backs of the general population. Pandemic prevention, readiness, and response are all areas that the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends being handled by an International Negotiation Body (INB). This might lead to an even greater concentration of power and further consolidation of global governance.
Striking the Appropriate Balance
Although the health certificate system can be useful in preventing the spread of COVID-19, it is critical to strike a healthy balance between the protection of the public’s health and the protection of individuals’ right to privacy. Transparency and accountability are needed in the process of putting these systems into place; in addition, there must be enough protections in place to protect the civil freedoms of individuals. In addition, it is of the utmost importance to include members of the general public in the deliberation and decision-making processes in order to guarantee that any new policies will have widespread support.
The pandemic caused by COVID-19 has brought to the forefront the requirement for novel approaches to stopping the virus’s further dissemination. Across the world, several health certificate systems have been put in place to keep track of the health condition and movements of persons. Yet, because of the intrusive nature of these technologies, there is a major risk to individuals’ right to privacy as well as their autonomy. It is of the utmost importance to achieve a balance between personal privacy and public health, while also ensuring that there is accountability, openness, and public engagement in the decision-making processes.