Oh, what a brilliant idea it is! Let’s plunge ourselves into darkness a couple of nights a week, all in the name of saving the planet! It’s almost as if the World Economic Forum and their friends are generously offering us a crash course in living like cavemen again – but with Wi-Fi, of course! Who needs electricity when we can just commune with nature and roast marshmallows over candle flames, right? Maybe, just maybe, the solution to all our problems lies in going back to simpler times and embracing our inner moles. After all, who needs 24/7 electricity when you have the “warmth” of a blackout? Bravo, WEF, bravo! 🕯️
In a bold move, the World Economic Forum (WEF), backed by other globalist bodies like the United Nations (UN) and the World Health Organization (WHO), is advocating for Americans to accept regular electrical grid blackouts as a means to combat the climate crisis. This radical green agenda, supported by the Biden administration, has sparked controversy and heated debates on the potential sacrifices needed for the greater good. In this article, we delve into the contentious proposal, exploring its implications, drawbacks, and the growing resistance from experts and the public alike.
Living with Blackouts: Sacrificing for Climate
The WEF is urging mainstream media outlets to promote the idea that Americans should endure at least two nights per week without electricity, regardless of the risks involved. The Los Angeles Times, a media outlet known for pushing the globalist agenda, has thrown its support behind this initiative, claiming that living with blackouts would facilitate an easier and more cost-effective fight against climate change.
The Green Agenda and Biden’s Role
The push for blackouts aligns with the radical green goals of the Biden administration, spearheaded by climate czar John Kerry. Since his inauguration, President Biden has signed executive orders aimed at advancing the globalists’ green agenda, leading to rising gas and energy prices and disruptions in the food supply. Kerry has also targeted the agriculture industry to combat emissions, raising concerns about potential government farm seizures.
California’s Struggle with Renewable Energy
Experts have long warned about potential blackouts in California as the state aggressively transitions from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources like wind and solar. Despite concerns over the impact on public safety and lives, some proponents argue that embracing more blackouts is necessary to address climate issues and make sacrifices for the greater good.
Resistance and Criticism
The idea of orchestrated blackouts to fight climate change has faced significant backlash on social media. Critics argue that net-zero policies and decarbonization efforts could lead to grid instability, energy insecurity, and more blackouts, countering the proposed benefits.
Conclusion
The proposition of accepting regular electrical grid blackouts as a solution to the climate crisis has ignited a heated debate across the nation. Advocates argue that these sacrifices are essential for the greater good and a sustainable future, while critics express concerns about public safety, energy security, and the effectiveness of such measures. As the push for green initiatives continues, the discussion surrounding blackouts and their impact on American life remains at the forefront of the climate crisis solution.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Real News Cast needs reader support to survive.
Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)
Please Contribute via GoGetFunding
