The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has been making headlines with its controversial projects and plans for a global network of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). While the International Monetary Fund (IMF) gears up to introduce its own CBDC system called UMU, the BIS is taking significant strides towards centralizing international banks and central banks under a single umbrella network. This article delves into the BIS’s projects, including Project Icebreaker and the latest development, Project Aurora, while shedding light on the potential implications.

1. Project Icebreaker: Homogenizing Currencies

The BIS’s Project Icebreaker aims to establish a SWIFT-like bottleneck system, paving the way for global banks to regulate and eventually homogenize all currencies into a single world exchange model. This consolidation of currencies would grant these banks unprecedented power, enabling them to exclude nations or companies that do not align with their ideological approval. The potential consequences of such a system raise concerns about financial autonomy and the erosion of national sovereignty.

2. Project Aurora: AI-Powered Financial Surveillance

The BIS’s newest project, Project Aurora, introduces a highly disturbing concept that utilizes machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) to monitor vast financial transactions worldwide. The primary objective of Project Aurora is to identify specific flagged patterns associated with criminal money laundering structures protected by “money mules.” However, in order to achieve real-time monitoring of global transactions, corporate banks, and governments would need to establish streamlined access to accounts and provide extensive data to the AI system.

Implications and Criticisms

1. Centralized Control: The BIS’s pursuit of a global network raises concerns about the concentration of power in the hands of a few financial institutions. Critics argue that such centralization diminishes the autonomy of individual nations and paves the way for potential abuses of power.
2. Privacy and Surveillance: The implementation of projects like Project Aurora necessitates significant access to financial data, raising questions about privacy and surveillance. Granting unrestricted access to corporate banks and governments for AI monitoring purposes poses risks to personal and financial privacy.
3. Financial Exclusion: As the BIS pushes for the homogenization of currencies, there is a legitimate concern that nations or companies deemed unfit by the centralized system could face exclusion from global financial transactions. This exclusionary approach could exacerbate existing inequalities and disproportionately affect marginalized economies.
4. Lack of Accountability: With the BIS at the apex of global control, questions arise regarding the transparency and accountability of its operations. Critics argue that the concentration of power within the BIS could lead to a lack of oversight and potential abuses without sufficient checks and balances.

Conclusion

The Bank for International Settlements, through projects like Icebreaker and Aurora, is forging ahead with its mission to establish a global network and orchestrate the rollout of Central Bank Digital Currencies. While proponents highlight the potential benefits of streamlined transactions and enhanced security, skeptics raise concerns about the concentration of power, erosion of privacy, and the risk of financial exclusion. As these projects continue to unfold, it is crucial to foster a global dialogue to ensure that any developments prioritize transparency, accountability, and the protection of individual and national financial sovereignty.

Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Real News Cast needs reader support to survive. 

Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)

Please Contribute via  GoGetFunding