Newly elected US House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) has made headlines with a strategic proposal to fund the federal govement, outlining a temporary plan that excludes aid to Ukraine and Israel. In a bold move, Johnson aims to address key priorities, particularly focusing on the defense of the US southern border.

A Strategic Funding Approach

Speaker Johnson’s proposed bill charts a unique course by excluding aid to Ukraine and Israel while ensuring essential funding for the defense of the US southern border. This article delves into the specifics of the proposal, its potential implications, and the reactions it has sparked.

Temporary Funding Allocation: Key Points

Johnson’s bill outlines a temporary funding strategy for various government programs, with notable exclusions. Let’s explore the key points:

Defense of the US Southern Border Takes Center Stage

Johnson’s proposal allocates funds specifically for the defense of the US southern border, underscoring the importance of border security in the current political landscape.

Selective Funding Until 19 January

The bill designates 19 January as the funding deadline for programs and agencies covered under regular appropriations bills related to agriculture, rural development, and the Food and Drug Administration.

Ceased Funding for Energy, Water Development, and Military Construction

Notably, funds for energy and water development, military construction, VEterans Affairs, as well as Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development will be ceased under this proposal.

Extended Planning Until 2 February

The allocation of money for the remaining government sectors is set to be calculated until 2 February, alowing for a comprehensive review and strategic distribution of resources.

Political Landscape: Expectations and Challenges

Johnson anticipates resistance from some Republicans, but he believes Democrats may lend their support if needed. However, the road ahead is uncertain, with potential challenges in the Senate. This article closely examines the political dynamics surrounding this proposal.

Speaker Johnson’s Statement: A Call for Fiscal Responsibility

In a statement, Johnson emphasizes the necessity of the two-step continuing resolution, positioning House Republicans strategically for conservitive victories. He highlights the separation of the CR from supplemental funding debates as crucial for achieving fiscal responsibility, oversight over Ukraine aid, and impactful policy changes at the southern border.

White House Response and Criticisms

White House spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierre dismisses Johnson’s proposal as a “recipe for more Republican chaos and more shutdowns.” She contends that Republicans are “wasting precious time with an unserious proposal.” The artice dissects theese criticisms and their potential impact on the proposal’s fate.

Republican Opposition: A Divided Front

Not all Republicans are aligned with Johnson’s proposal. House Freedom Caucus member Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) voices strong opposition, emphasizing concerns about funding Pelosi-level spending and policies for 75 days.

Historical Context: Biden’s Previous Budget Struggles

This proposal follows in the footsteps of earlier budgetary struggles, notably US President Joe Biden’s request for $24 billion in aid to Ukraine. The article draws parallels between past challenges and the current political landscape, shedding light on the potential ramifications of excluding aid to Ukraine and Israel.

Biden’s Stance: A Firm Position on Aid Allocation

The article concludes by highlighting President Biden’s firm stance, stating that he would not sign a bill allocating aid to Israel without Ukraine. This sets the stage for potential conflicts and negotiations in Congress.

Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Real News Cast needs reader support to survive. 

Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)

Please Contribute via  GoGetFunding